Table of Evaluation from Respondents

Speaker	Content of the Presentation	Percentage	Overall Quality of Presentation	Percentage
Paul W. Flinn	Very useful	32.3	Excellent	41.9
	Useful	51.6	Good	48.4
	Somewhat useful	9.7	Fair	0.0
	N/A	6.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Jerry Heaps	Very useful	45.2	Excellent	38.7
	Useful	45.2	Good	48.4
	Somewhat useful	3.2	Fair	3.2
	N/A	6.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Ole Dosland	Very useful	48.4	Excellent	51.6
	Useful	32.3	Good	32.3
	Somewhat useful	12.9	Fair	6.4
	N/A	6.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Linda Mason	Very useful	19.4	Excellent	32.3
	Useful	38.7	Good	41.9
	Somewhat useful	35.5	Fair	16.1
	N/A	6.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
David Weaver	Very useful	22.6	Excellent	25.8
	Useful	54.8	Good	51.6
	Somewhat useful	16.1	Fair	9.7
	N/A	6.5	Poor	0.0
			N/A	12.9
Michael Toews	Very useful	35.5	Excellent	41.9
	Useful	38.7	Good	41.9
	Somewhat useful	19.4	Fair	6.5
	N/A	6.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Jerry Heaps & Bob Richardson	Very useful	25.8	Excellent	41.9
	Useful	51.6	Good	35.5
	Somewhat useful	16.1	Fair	9.7
	N/A	6.5	Poor	3.2
			N/A	9.7
Ron Durham	Very useful	16.1	Excellent	29.0
	Useful	54.8	Good	45.2
	Somewhat useful	19.4	Fair	12.9
	N/A	9.7	Poor	0.0
			N/A	12.9
Bill Pursley	Very useful	38.7	Excellent	35.5
	Useful	45.2	Good	45.2
	Somewhat useful	6.4	Fair	6.4
	N/A	9.7	Poor	0.0
			N/A	12.9
Frank Arthur & Ted Rogers	Very useful	38.7	Excellent	45.2
	Useful	38.7	Good	32.3
	Somewhat useful	12.9	Fair	12.9
	N/A	9.7	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.6
Herb Yeaman	Very useful	25.8	Excellent	22.6
	Useful	45.2	Good	58.1
	Somewhat useful	19.4	Fair	6.4
	N/A	9.6	Poor	0.0
			N/A	12.9
Suresh Prabhakaran	Very useful	16.1	Excellent	16.1
	Useful	64.5	Good	61.3
	Somewhat useful	6.5	Fair	6.5
	N/A	12.9	Poor	0.0
			N/A	16.1
Thadd Bigler	Very useful	22.6	Excellent	19.4
	Useful	35.5	Good	32.3
	Somewhat useful	32.3	Fair	29.0
	N/A	9.6	Poor	6.4
			N/A	12.9
Kim Kemp	Very useful	61.3	Excellent	64.5
	Useful	25.8	Good	22.6
	Somewhat useful	6.5	Fair	3.2
	N/A	6.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Jeff Weiver	Very useful	45.2	Excellent	45.2
	Useful	25.8	Good	19.4
	Somewhat useful	25.8	Fair	29.0
	N/A	3.2	Poor	0.0
			N/A	6.4
Rennie Roesli	Very useful	25.8	Excellent	19.4
	Useful	41.9	Good	32.3
	Somewhat useful	29.0	Fair	35.5
	N/A	3.3	Poor	6.4
			N/A	6.4
Carl Reed	Very useful	25.8	Excellent	25.8
	Useful	51.6	Good	61.3
	Somewhat useful	19.4	Fair	6.4
	N/A	3.2	Poor	0.0
			N/A	6.5
Tour Mills Prior to Heat Treatment	Very useful	45.2	Excellent	38.7
	Useful	25.8	Good	25.8
	Somewhat useful	12.9	Fair	9.7
	N/A	16.1	Poor	0.0
			N/A	25.8
Steve Hewitt	Very useful	54.8	Excellent	32.3
	Useful	35.5	Good	61.3
	Somewhat useful	9.7	Fair	3.2
	N/A	0.0	Poor	0.0
			N/A	3.2
Mimoun Abaraw	Very useful	16.1	Excellent	16.1
	Useful	61.3	Good	51.6
	Somewhat useful	22.6	Fair	29.0
	N/A	0.0	Poor	0.0
			N/A	3.3
Kim Kemp	Very useful	58.1	Excellent	51.6
	Useful	38.7	Good	38.7
	Somewhat useful	0.0	Fair	3.2
	N/A	3.2	Poor	0.0
			N/A	6.5
Debra Krug-Reyes	Very useful	48.4	Excellent	29.0
	Useful	38.7	Good	51.6
	Somewhat useful	0.0	Fair	16.1
	N/A	3.2	Poor	0.0
			N/A	3.3
Bryan Houtchens	Very useful	35.5	Excellent	51.6
	Useful	41.9	Good	32.3
	Somewhat useful	22.6	Fair	12.9
	N/A	0.0	Poor	0.0
			N/A	3.2
Ron Grinham	Very useful	48.4	Excellent	54.8
	Useful	16.1	Good	22.6
	Somewhat useful	29.0	Fair	12.9
	N/A	6.5	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Alan LeBrun	Very useful	38.7	Excellent	29.0
	Useful	45.2	Good	45.2
	Somewhat useful	6.5	Fair	9.7
	N/A	9.6	Poor	0.0
			N/A	16.1
Walk through facility under heat treatment	Very useful	67.7	Excellent	45.2
	Useful	16.1	Good	29.0
	Somewhat useful	3.3	Fair	0.0
	N/A	12.9	Poor	3.2
			N/A	22.6
Ron Grinham	Very useful	51.6	Excellent	51.6
	Useful	25.8	Good	25.8
	Somewhat useful	16.1	Fair	9.7
	N/A	6.5	Poor	3.2
			N/A	9.7
Kim Kemp	Very useful	54.8	Excellent	45.2
	Useful	35.5	Good	41.9
	Somewhat useful	3.2	Fair	3.2
	N/A	6.5	Poor	0.0
			N/A	9.7
Anil Menon	Very useful	58.1	Excellent	48.4
	Useful	32.3	Good	35.5
	Somewhat useful	0.0	Fair	0.0
	N/A	9.6	Poor	0.0
			N/A	16.1
Walk through facility under heat treatment	Very useful	67.7	Excellent	54.8
	Useful	9.7	Good	12.9
	Somewhat useful	3.2	Fair	0.0
	N/A	19.4	Poor	0.0
			N/A	32.3
Brian Zeichner	Very useful	51.6	Excellent	48.4
	Useful	32.3	Good	32.3
	Somewhat useful	0.0	Fair	0.0
	N/A	16.1	Poor	0.0
			N/A	19.3
Ron Grinham	Very useful	41.9	Excellent	51.6
	Useful	29.0	Good	22.6
	Somewhat useful	16.2	Fair	9.7
	N/A	12.9	Poor	0.0
			N/A	16.1
Michael Olexa	Very useful	51.6	Excellent	54.8
	Useful	22.6	Good	19.4
	Somewhat useful	3.2	Fair	0.0
	N/A	22.6	Poor	0.0
			N/A	25.8

K-State Research and Extension

Subramanyam Lab

Table of Evaluation from Respondents